Financial Analysis — Return on Investment

Enter facility data below — all results update instantly as you type

Facility & deployment

Current repositioning spend

Etac / Hovertech

$
$
$

Medline

$
$

Stryker / Sage

$
$

EHOB

$
$
$

Hercules

$
Sum of all products above

EasyBoost™ pricing

(Devices × $4,850 ÷ 60) + (qty × disposable sheet price)
(Devices × $4,850 ÷ 60) + (ceil(qty ÷ washes) × sheet price) + (initial 500-sheet inventory ÷ 60)
$
$
$
$
Capital & lease ongoing sheet cost — replaces current slings
$
Assumes changed every 3 days · replaced after washes

Injury & workers' comp

$
$

Nursing time

$

Your results are ready

Enter your name and email to unlock the full savings analysis, TCO comparison, and acquisition breakdown.

Current Repositioning Spend
TAP + Glide + Hovermatt + Hercules
per month — all products combined
EasyBoost™ Disposable
Committed Sheet Contract (5-yr)
per month — $0 upfront
Device amortized · replaces all current spend
EasyBoost™ Launderable
Committed Sheet Contract (5-yr)
per month — $0 upfront · lowest cost
Device amortized into contract · all-in
Launderable — monthly savings
Launderable — saved vs current (3 yr)
Launderable — saved vs current (5 yr)
Disposable — saved vs current (3 yr)

Acquisition model comparison — full cost breakdown

Model EasyBoost™ Disposable EasyBoost™ Launderable Current Spend
Capital Purchase
CapEx · one-time device
24-Month Lease
OpEx · $0 upfront
36-Month Lease
OpEx · $0 upfront
Recommended
60-Mo Committed Sheet
OpEx · $0 upfront · all-in pricing

Total cost of ownership comparison

Period Current Spend EasyBoost™ Disposable EasyBoost™ Launderable Save vs Current Spend
(launderable)
1 Year
3 Years
5 Years

Current spend = total of all current repositioning products combined. EasyBoost replaces all current product spend — $0 upfront, device amortized in monthly rate.

Monthly cost comparison — hard costs

Hard costs

Repositioning product spend cut
EasyBoost disposable contract
EasyBoost launderable contract

Net savings based on launderable committed model

Soft cost opportunity

Workers' comp (direct)
Injury replacement & recruitment
Nursing time recovered

Informational — not included in hard cost savings

Clinical evidence — hospital RN evaluation (n=16, March 2026)

94%
believe EasyBoost improves caregiver safety
88%
would boost more often using the device
5:2
preferred over competitor when both evaluated
0/16
rated overall experience negative

Request a customized analysis

Seneca will model your facility's actual injury data, sheet spend, and staffing costs to produce a site-specific ROI.

senecadevices.com/easyboost